Monday, April 2, 2012

Elder Abuse: Paying Attention to an Under-reported, Yet Prevalent, Form of Domestic Violence

By Rachel Musleah
Adapted from Jewish Women International's Magazine, Jewish Woman


It took 51 years, but at the age of 71, Libby Klein (not her real name), a mother of three and grandmother of five, finally gathered the courage to walk out of a physically and emotionally abusive relationship. A Holocaust survivor born in Poland, Klein endured escapes, abandonments and secret hiding places from the age of four, until she came to the U.S. with her father at the age of 12 (the rest of her family perished in the war). She married at 19 and earned a master’s degree in social work. Though she never doubted her capacity for success, her childhood memories left her yearning for stability and impeded her leaving the abusive relationship. “I was terrified of being alone,” she says. 

Empowered by therapy, and frightened by an incident in which her husband grabbed her by the neck, she took advantage of his absence one October day, filled a bag with a few things, moved temporarily into a hotel and filed a restraining order. She has since received counseling and other services from Kol Isha (A Woman’s Voice), a nonsectarian program for victims of domestic violence run by the Jewish Family and Children’s Service of Greater Boston. Klein’s experience has an inspiring footnote: When she called her adult daughter to tell her she had left, members of a small conference her daughter was attending heard what was transpiring. Later, the daughter received a call from a conference member, saying Klein’s bravery had spurred her to move out of a 28-year relationship. “It’s incredible how common this is,” says Klein. “So many women just live with it and do nothing.”

On Manhattan’s Lower East Side, Helen Blackman (not her real name) doesn’t let her 98 years stop her from attending classes and lectures. As active as her mind remains, because she is blind, a caregiver supplied by a local organization bilked her out of $5,000. For two years, the caregiver helped Blackman pay her bills, wrote checks and read her mail. “She made me feel that she likes me very much and she’s my friend,” says Blackman, who lost her husband 16 years ago and whose daughter lives in California. “What she did is make out checks in her name and made me sign. She said it’s a bill.” When the caregiver was absent due to cosmetic surgery, a substitute noticed the checks on Blackman’s bank statement and alerted her. Jewish Association for Services to the Aged (JASA) provided a lawyer at no cost and helped her retrieve the money from the caregiver, who subsequently lost her job. “You cannot trust anybody,” Blackman concludes. “I have heard about elder abuse but I didn’t think it would happen to me. I want to go on with my life and forget about these things. All I want is peace and pleasure.”

Though both these stories end positively, they point to the prevalence of elder abuse, a term used to encompass physical, emotional, financial and sexual mistreatment, as well as neglect—failing to provide care, medication and food willfully or because of ignorance or ill health on the part of a caregiver. And, they highlight the fact that the Jewish community is not immune. “When you say  ‘elder abuse,’” notes Art Mason, director of the Elder Abuse Prevention Program of Lifespan, a non-profit organization in Monroe County, N.Y., “people think of nursing home abuse, but most elder mistreatment takes place in people’s own homes. The idea is so repugnant that there is a real state of denial. But it happens across the board, in every social, economic, and religious community.” Elder abuse often remains hidden, says Mason: “A child goes to school, a domestic violence victim goes to work, but it’s easy to keep an older adult isolated.”

The recent sensational headlines in the case of Manhattan socialite Brooke Astor generated an increase in publicity, and illustrated that elder mistreatment can cut across all social strata. It’s time, say experts, for elder abuse to attain the priority status now accorded to child abuse and domestic violence. “My kids know not to get in the car of a stranger because as a society and a community we’ve taken a stand and made it an important lesson. We haven’t done that with elder abuse. If we did, older people might know what to look out for and what to do,” says Joy Solomon, director and managing attorney at the Harry & Jeanette Weinberg Center for Elder Abuse Prevention and Intervention at the Hebrew Home for the Aged at Riverdale, N.Y, and director of the elder law division at the Pace Women’s Justice Center. “Elder mistreatment doesn’t generate the same sense of outrage,” agrees Karen Stein, director of the Clearinghouse on Abuse and Neglect of the Elderly (CANE) at the University of Delaware. CANE is a partner of the National Center on Elder Abuse. 

Solomon stresses that elder abuse is a Jewish problem: “We have a responsibility and an obligation to the poor and elderly and those less fortunate, both Jewish and non-Jewish,” she says. Visiting the sick, respect for the elderly, honoring your parents—these timeless Jewish values, the bedrock of Judaism, make elder abuse within the Jewish community even more perplexing and tragic.

According to the National Center on Elder Abuse, no one knows precisely how many older Americans are being abused, neglected or exploited. The National Research Council Panel to Review Risk and Prevalence of Elder Abuse and Neglect estimates that between 1 million and 2 million Americans ages 65 and older have been mistreated by someone they depended on for care or protection. A 1998 National Elder Abuse Incidence Study indicates that for every one reported case of elder abuse, about five more go unreported. Both men and women are victimized. Self-neglect, which is easier to substantiate, is sometimes included in statistics, and sometimes reported separately. Some states don’t mandate reporting because adults are supposed to be competent in making their own choices. “One of the problems in getting elder abuse on the agenda is the fact that we do not have reliable numbers,” notes Stein. “People are reluctant to report; every state has a different reporting system; and the cases can be categorized differently. We suspect the numbers we have found of substantiated cases represent the tip of the iceberg.”

Elder mistreatment first appeared in the national spotlight in the 1970s, when Florida Rep. Claude Pepper chaired the House Special Select Committee on Aging, which investigated fraud against the elderly, elder abuse in nursing homes and in the home, and age discrimination. While “a patchwork of laws” has since sprung up, according to Stein, no nationally accepted definitions, standards or guidelines exist. The Elder Justice Act, currently under consideration in Congress, proposes legislation that would coordinate elder abuse prevention, require criminal background checks of nursing aides, provide better training of workers in detecting abuse, enhance law enforcement response, and establish a federal office of Adult Protective Services.

Every social worker and lawyer in the field of elder abuse has a distressingly high supply of true stories. Mason, who handles about 300 cases a year, estimates that five to eight percent are Jewish. He tells of a 79-year-old Jewish man suffering from dementia whose “spottily employed” nephew forced him to sign a power of attorney, then plundered his uncle’s assets and credit cards, left him without any food in his house, and even stole an heirloom menorah. Despite his dementia, the uncle realized the menorah was missing. Mason’s office was able to revoke the power of attorney, have the menorah returned, and provide food with the help of the local Jewish Family Services.

Mason also tells of a quiet, sweet woman in a group he used to run. She described how her husband smashed dishes and threatened her with a knife when dinner was not on the table on time. “One of the other women asked why she didn’t leave him,” Mason recalls. “She replied:  ‘I was in the [concentration] camps as a teenager. After what I went through, putting up with him is nothing.’” 

Helena Ross, the social work supervisor at the Visiting Doctors Program at Mt. Sinai Hospital in Manhattan, says the doctors who visit homebound patients often report situations of abuse. In one difficult case, a daughter had left her father in filthy conditions, without even a towel. A dead mouse was found on the premises. “The case worker from Adult Protective Services said,  ‘How can a child treat a parent like this?’ It turns out the father was not really a nice guy and had burnt his bridges. Often there’s a long-standing history of dysfunctional relationships, but my goal is always the protection of the client.”

No predictors delineate who will become an abuser, says Solomon, though there are risk factors. The typical scenario involves an adult relative who is dependent on the victim for money and housing, or needs money for drugs or gambling. Sometimes it is domestic violence grown old. 

But emergency shelters specifically for older people are sorely lacking. “Traditional domestic violence shelters are completely inappropriate,” Solomon explains. “They are not based on a medical model, so they don’t accept older people with medical issues or dementia. They don’t accept men. And older people don’t usually want to be in shelters with families and young children.” According to the September 2005 update of the National Clearinghouse on Abuse in Later Life resource directory, only nine facilities throughout the country were categorized as being or having “elder shelters,” although what that means varies greatly.

Creating a shelter welcoming to older people was at the top of Solomon’s wish list when she met Daniel Reingold, president and chief executive officer of the Hebrew Home. Since the Weinberg Center opened two years ago, it has handled 97 referrals; of those, 25 have resulted in admission (the others were not appropriate or decided not to enter the shelter); three have been Jewish. “Initially, we thought we’d have hordes,” says Solomon. But it has been difficult to locate people living in isolation, and difficult to convince them to leave their homes even when they acknowledge abuse. Solomon is working with the American Association of Homes and Services to the Aged—the umbrella organization for nursing homes, assisted living, and long-term facilities for aged—to replicate the Weinberg model, that is, clients are housed in an appropriate level of care within the Home.

Solomon describes several cases that have ended successfully. In one, a widower married a much younger Russian woman who abused him physically and verbally and mismanaged his medication. He checked into a hospital 18 times over the course of two years just to escape her. The Weinberg Center had opened during his last hospital visit, and a social worker there made a referral. “We got an order of protection against her and assisted him in getting a divorce,” says Solomon. He returned home for a short time, but needed greater care.  Now a long-term resident at the Home, he just celebrated his 90th birthday. 

“Because it’s often a family member doing the abuse, there’s a lot of shame,” says Solomon. “Mothers don’t want to say,  ‘My son is stealing from me or hurting me.’ It makes them think they are bad mothers. Victims might be willing to come forward more often and accept intervention if we figured out how to help them live safely instead of separating families.” Ironically, strong family structures may deter victims from reporting: “If a grandchild is stealing from a grandparent,” Stein says by way of example, “the grandparent may be reluctant to report it to the authorities because of embarrassment, because of fear that it would worsen the relationship between them and other family members, or fear that it might lead to court action or arrest.”

A more “enlightened” model, says Solomon, would be to teach safety planning and independent banking, to get abusers into drug rehabilitation or anger management, or to provide respite for overstressed caregivers (perhaps taking care of those with Alzheimer’s or dementia) and therefore abusive. “It’s not a great model, but a different one,” says Solomon. Some agencies, including Jewish ones, have “community guardianship” programs with court-appointed guardians. 

It’s important to tailor intervention based on the dynamics of each situation, says Sharon Merriman-Nai, CANE program specialist. In situations of caregiver stress, respite, support or educational services might relieve the problem. But if the abuse is domestic violence grown old, those methods will not resolve the power and control dynamic. “There is a lot of debate as to whether cases of physical abuse are really domestic violence grown old or a new phenomenon,” says Merriman-Nai. “When older women are victimized, the patterns are similar to those of younger women, but the consequences are more severe: the extent of their injuries is likely to be more severe and take longer to heal. They may be more reluctant to leave their partners because their financial security is at stake and they may believe they don’t have as many options.” 

However victims are classified, says Merriman-Nai, “everyone needs to work in a collaborative format to serve this population more effectively.” The cutting edge approach, say experts, is through multidisciplinary teams of Adult Protective Services, doctors, nurses, mental health professionals, law enforcement, lawyers, clergy, advocates and others.

Laura Radensky, associate director of social work for community services at New York’s Jewish Home and Hospital Lifecare Systems, stresses the importance of education and training. With a grant from the David Berg Foundation, the Jewish Home established a program to train nurses, social workers and translators in the Home Care program. They, in turn, will educate home health aides who come into contact with the 1,100 community clients. A half-day training course open to community professionals is scheduled for the spring.

Even when workers know what to look for and spot the abuse, obstacles can intrude: “Sometimes a home health aide will be threatened with repercussions or intimidated by the abuser,” says Radensky. “The aide might not report it until he or she reaches the breaking point and quits.” Radensky has addressed state-wide and national conferences on the importance of training home health workers to recognize elder abuse.

Clergy can also play a vital role. “We ask for people’s religious affiliation because sometimes having a rabbi or priest assist in interventions is tremendously helpful to break the ice,” Mason explains. “Trust is often taken away in elder abuse. When we walk in, the older person’s initial reaction is, ‘Why trust you?’ A rabbi or priest comes in with a certain amount of trust, and that transfers to us.” 

Much more remains to be done. “Rabbis aren’t talking about elder abuse, so people don’t see the synagogue as a resource,” argues Solomon. “People would come forward more if the leadership of the community would stand up and say this is not okay.” 

Honoring elders and caregivers in the synagogue should be high on the agenda, says Solomon, who is creating a Shabbat on aging in her own synagogue. “Everyone has someone older in his or her life—a parent, a neighbor—so these issues should matter to everybody. Or maybe people are starting to think about their own aging. Honoring older people is the opposite of abuse.”

When clients leave the Weinberg Center, they, other victims and anyone whom they have met during their stay can express themselves in a ritual goodbye. “A lot of victims don’t feel important,” says Solomon. “We want them to see themselves differently than when they came in. The ritual allows them to feel that this place was sacred, and that they are sacred.”
What are the warning signs of elder abuse?
The National Center for Elder Abuse lists the items below as possible indications of elder abuse:

• Bruises, pressure marks, broken bones, abrasions and burns may be an indication of physical abuse, neglect or mistreatment.
• Unexplained withdrawal from normal activities, a sudden change in alertness, and unusual depression may be indicators of emotional abuse.
• Bruises around the breasts or genital area can result from sexual abuse.
• Sudden changes in financial situations may be the result of exploitation.
• Bedsores, unattended medical needs, poor hygiene and unusual weight loss are indicators of possible neglect.
• Behavior such as belittling, threats and other uses of power and control by spouses are indicators of verbal or emotional abuse.
• Strained or tense relationships, frequent arguments between the caregiver and elderly person are also signs of abuse.

Most important is to be alert. The suffering often takes place in silence. If you notice personality or behavioral changes, you should start to question what is going on.

JCADA services victims of Elder Abuse. If you or someone you know needs help, please call our confidential helpline at 1-877-88-JCADA(52232)

Rahel Musleah is an award-winning journalist, author and speaker. Visit her website, www.rahelsjewishindia.com.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Getting It All Out in the Open

By Kelley Kidd, JCADA intern and Moment Magazine Blogger 
Jewish husbands, we think, are educated and upstanding, family men who treat their wives with warmth, kindness and respect. Domestic abuse? Not in our backyard.
We need only look to recent news coverage to see that it is in our backyard: For approximately four years, Aharon Friedman, a Congressional staffer living in the Washington, DC area, has been refusing to grant his wife Tamar Epstein a get, or a Jewish decree of divorce. According to Jewish law, the husband must initiate divorce proceedings, a generally unproblematic technicality. Sometimes, though, a husband may refuse, as Friedman has. As a result, Epstein is an agunah, or a “chained woman” under Jewish law, unable to remarry or move forward in her emotional or romantic life. Despite the completion of their civil divorce, as well as widespread condemnation of his behavior, Friedman refuses to relinquish control over her life by consenting to a religiously valid divorce. Prominent Washington-area Rabbi Shmuel Herzfeld describes this behavior as emotional abuse that is “no less a form of spousal abuse than striking one’s wife.”
Unfortunately, Friedman’s abusive behavior is not the only issue at hand. We are also faced with the fact that in Judaism, there exists a mindset that preserving tradition in the form of “a nearly thousand-year-old ruling is more important than offering women equality within the religion.” As Dvora Meyerswrites in The Forward, we see a husband “brandishing a psychological weapon and threatening his wife with it” because current Jewish law allows for it, and rabbis lack the “judicial courage” to implement “halachic proposals that would enable a rabbinic court to dissolve marriage contract even without the husband’s consent.” The law actually facilitates the continuation of abuse, in the form of emotional control.
This story sheds light on what has always been a fairly unspoken issue—as I mentioned, no one really considers abuse to be a Jewish problem. In fact, though, Jewish homes face the same rate of abuse as the rest of the community—it occurs in 15% of Jewish families, across the religious and socio-economic spectrum. Abuse includes a wide range of action, all of which tend to center on control of the other partner. This may mean physical abuse, such as any kind of attack or beating, or sexual, which entails forcing oneself sexually on the other partner and demanding sexual acts that violate the partner’s wants. But, as we see in the case of Aharon Friedman, it also crosses into the realm of the less tangible, the use of intimidation, manipulation, criticism and humiliation that characterize emotional forms of abuse. Economic abuse entails keeping tight control of someone by monitoring their finances and withholding their money and choice in order to determine what they can and cannot do. These types of abuse may exist independently or in conjunction with one another.
So, if abuse is just as widespread as issue within the Jewish community as in the general population, and perhaps even justified by certain Jewish laws, we must consider why most people are so oblivious to it. Though our rate stands no higher than that in the rest of the population, Jewish women tend to stay in abusive relationships for two to three times longer than women in the general population. It seems likely, then, that there are cultural factors in Judaism that contribute to the fatal silence that surrounds abuse in Jewish homes. On the most basic level, observant women may hesitate to leave their home for logistical or financial reasons—many observant women depend on their husband for an income. And in pursuing a divorce, what if she finds herself “chained,” anagunah like Tamar Epstein?
Beyond that, however, it seems that there is a stigma surrounding abuse of Jewish women, creating shanda, or shame, regarding being the victim of abuse. Women may be hesitant to come forward because they believe “Jews are not supposed to be victims of abuse” and fear being ostracized in the community, or simply not believed. Abuse has hardly come up in Jewish forums, so our culture has failed to send the message that women should feel comfortable coming forward and being honest. In fact, Shalom Bayit, one of the few mitzvot dedicated to women, sends quite the opposite message. Shalon Bayit refers to Peace in the Home, the Jewish woman’s “pride and joy” according to tradition. This expectation that a woman create the ideal home to family, education, and love may prevent a woman from seeing it as socially acceptable to “shatter” that image by being honest about an abusive situation.
Some in the Jewish community are fighting domestic abuse. The public outcry over Friedman’s treatment of his wife—including efforts to pressure his boss, Congressman Dave Camp of Michigan, to intervene—proves that the issue is coming to the fore. And the Jewish Coalition Against Domestic Abuse, based outside of Washington, DC, works to eliminate the issue’s shroud of secrecy. It is our duty to look beyond what is easiest to believe and find the truth. Friedman and Epstein’s case demonstrates the absolute necessity of this kind of critical thinking. And once we see that the tragic truth stems in part from our own cultural creation, we can move towards bringing about a norm of justice, and true Shalom Bayit that is far more worthwhile than the illusion currently masking the need for meaningful cultural change.
Originally featured on Moment Magazine's Blog, InTheMoment March 15th, 2012

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Rethinking Purim

By Rabbi Donna Kirshbaum from Jewish Women International’s Rethinking Purim, Women,Relationships and Jewish Texts

Waking up in the middle of the night with a splitting headache, how do we find our way to the medicine cabinet? Probably with a sense other than seeing: our bare feet, perhaps, can feel carpet, then wood, then finally, tile. Our hands know when to protect the rest of us – just in case our partner has left that closet door ajar, again. Our ears listen for the special creak in the floorboards near the raised threshold to the bathroom. On the way back, our noses might catch the scent of the dog sleeping by the side of the bed and tell us we're almost there. But when staying in others' homes or hotels, we don't have the luxury of such nonvisual knowing. So we carry a flashlight or leave a nightlight on – and still feel disoriented.

And so it may happen when we have pain that can't be relieved by a pill. If we don't have familiarity with the innermost 'rooms' in ourselves and, at the same time a sense of our whole house and where our house is located in the larger world, we may feel disoriented and confused when emotional pain strikes or worsens. It is good to get to know ourselves, deeply, before such a time – through prayer, through regular walks, through keeping a journal or engaging in some other contemplative, spirit building exercise. Such familiarity may prove to be lifesustaining, even lifesaving.

The story of Purim, as told in Megillat Esther, makes no mention of the Divine. Not one word. Thus the Divine Presence, the Anochi ["I"] is like the "I" of Deuteronomy 31:18, says Rabbi Yitzhak Huttner (19061980) in Pahad Yitzhak: "I – the One Who is surely concealed." The text of Purim asks us to "see" the Divine with our other senses, since the Divine cannot be seen in the text. We might even say that Purim demands an inner knowledge akin to what we know about our homes and the habits of those who inhabit them with us as we go for aspirin in the middle of the night.

Rabbi Huttner concludes that "the redemption of Purim [i.e., the sense of rescue, safety, and connection that is offered by Purim], [the one holiday] which taught Israel to discover the Anochi [the "I"] in darkness and concealment, will surely remain as an enduring achievement in the soul of Israel... All the other holidays will [eventually] be annulled – except for Purim." What, no more Passover? Yom Kippur? Sukkot or Hanukkah or Shavuot? No, says Rabbi Huttner, implying that the original Pesach (at the beginning of the Jewish year according to one way of counting, in the springtime month of Nissan) required much in the way of Divine intervention, especially in the form of miracles. Purim (at the end of the year of which Nissan is considered the first month), required no seen miracles, but much in the way of human initiative.

Esther not only has the resources to save her people, she has the courage to take initiative. Will we, like Esther, be ready to take the initiative for redemption – for rescue, safety, connection – especially when we, too, feel like we're beginning in the dark?

1 in 4 women will experience domestic abuse in her lifetime. There are too many people in our community suffering in the dark from the effects of abuse. Take the initiative and learn what you can do to help yourself, help a friend and help your community today.


RabbiKirshbaum is a member of JWI's Clergy Task Force on Domestic Abuse in the Jewish Community and serves a Reconstructionist congregation in Princeton, NJ. She is a contributor to JWI's revised Clergy Guide, to the Project S.A.R.A.H. website, and to A Guide to Jewish Practice: Everyday Living, a winner of the 2011 National Jewish Book Awards in the category of Contemporary Jewish Life and Practice.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Yom Kippur Refelction 2011

By Rabbi David Rose, JCADA Advisory Board Member

The most well known piyyut (medieval liturgical poem) of the High Holy Day liturgy is the U-netaneh Tokef. In this moving meditation we read; “Even the angels are dismayed, seized with fear and trembling they cry out: ‘The Day of Judgment has arrived!’” 

Our tradition sees the Day of Judgment as a wonderful gift from God. Judgment seems like an awful, terrible thing, and yet our tradition sees these Days of Judgment as a beautiful blessing. We call these days ‘Yom Tov,’ literally ‘good or festive days’; for they are an opportunity for self-awareness and improvement. We come to the Heavenly Court, so-to-speak, contrite for our failings and proud of our accomplishments. Reviewing our successes and our failures of the past year, we individually take responsibility for our own lives and chart a path for blessings in the coming year.

But what if every day was Yom HaDin, The Day of Judgment? What if every single day brought fear and trembling? What if this constant judgment was never just? What if the judgment was not through self-awareness before the Heavenly Judge but was daily before an earthly, capricious, abusive individual who had set themselves up as your judge, jury and prosecutor? What if the sentences of this malicious judge were a way of exercising control and power over your life and choices?

So it is for millions in our midst who suffer in abusive relationships. Abuse, a pattern of coercive behaviors used to establish power and control over an intimate partner, leaves those victimized by these behaviors in constant fear and trembling. “I constantly felt like I was being judged,” a woman who had left an abusive relationship told me. “What made it so frightening was that the rules by which I was being judged constantly changed. I never knew what would set him off. I walked around on eggshells, paralyzed, in never ending fear, just waiting for the next explosion.”  For many who suffer in abusive relationships there are periods of calm and tenderness but those spells never seem to last. “When after days or even weeks of his behaving like an angel he would again belittle me, make fun of me, embarrass me in front of our children and friends, criticize me for things that he complimented me for just days earlier, there was a strange kind of relief that things were back to ‘normal.’”

“Normal” for too many, mostly women, sitting in our midst in synagogues and temples this Yom Kippur is living with constant fear and trembling. Unfortunately, for these individuals the themes and liturgy of the holy day can add to their suffering and pain. Those who are abusive regularly ask those they have harmed for forgiveness; they vow to change, to make teshuvah (repentance or change). The liturgy encourages us to be forgiving; as God is forgiving and compassionate. The rabbi may ask us during services to turn to our partners and ask for pardon. But what if there is no teshuvah, no real change?

 At Yizkor (Memorial Service) we are called to remember the righteous and good deeds of our departed family members. What if the father we are remembering was abusive of our mother? What if we were relieved to be finally free when our husband who abused us for years died? How are we to recite Yizkor prayers for such individuals?

We must remember that teshuvah is never automatic. Saying you are “sorry” is not the same as being sorry and changing. Yom Kippur does not ask us to just go through the motions, to just mumble the right words; Yom Kippur calls on us to do the hard work of teshuvah.  It is so very important that we recognize that teshuvah is a process that involves multiple steps. In her book, I Thought We’d Never Speak Again: The Road From Estrangement to Reconciliation, Laura Davis makes reference to the five R’s of teshuvah: recognition, remorse, repentance, restitution and reform. On Yom Kippur we make a safe place in our midst for those who have been abused by unequivocally declaring that our tradition never tolerates controlling our intimate partners and that we need not forgive another who has not made real teshuvah. And, we must be clear to those who perpetrate family violence that the Holy One of Blessing calls upon them to acknowledge responsibility, to demonstrate remorse by truly changing behavior and to make restitution for damages caused. For more on teshuvah and domestic violence see Gus Kaufman’s outstanding article, Renewal and Reconciliation after Family Violence, found on the FaithTrust website.

We can also demonstrate our commitment to safety and justice in our communities at the Yizkor service by acknowledging that because of abusive behavior it is not always possible to remember righteous deeds of parents and intimate partners who have passed on. Such an acknowledgment creates greater awareness of the prevalence of family violence in our midst and gives permission to those who have suffered from such violence to express their grief for what could have been and should have been.

This Yom Kippur as we stand before God in judgment, grateful for the gift of life and for the sacred opportunity to improve our lives, let us make a place of safety and peace for those who are painfully and unfairly judged day after day. Let us work together to combat the egregious sin of domestic abuse in our communities and homes by shining light on the problem. And, let us build communities that nourish and support healthy and sacred relationship. Then when the Days of Judgment arrive we will all find favor before God and all humanity.

With blessings for an easy fast, a deeply meaningful Day of Atonement and a joyous 5772!

Rabbi David Rose 

Ordained at The Jewish Theological Seminary, Rabbi Rose is the Founder and Director of JDiscover. In 2009, he was designated 'Clergy Person of the Year' by the Interfaith Community Against Domestic Violence, Maryland.  Rabbi Rose served as Chairman of Jewish Women International Clergy Taskforce on Domestic Abuse from 2007 through 2011.

Since 1993, Rabbi Rose has trained more than 250 members of clergy, of all faiths, in recognizing and responding to the challenge of Domestic Abuse. He has counseled hundreds of women from around the country helping them toward safety and new lives.  His perspectives on this subject are featured in the documentary film "When the Vow Breaks." In 2004, he was awarded a "Certificate of Special Congressional Recognition" and the Jewish Coalition Against Domestic Abuse's "Community Service Award" for these efforts.

*Taken from the Faith Trust Institute